OpenFatigue™ — Open is the new closed
21 points by kngl
21 points by kngl
Very interesting that they put GPL more open than MIT. From a user's or coder's perspective, MIT is more open because it doesn't limit how you can use the code. From a community and ecosystem perspective, GPL is more open because of its virality, especially with AGPL.
I think the argument is that GPL is more open because code licensed under it should stay open, since you have less freedom to make a closed source product with it - in my mind that slider is roughly in order of "how far along it is to being closed".