My reflex of assuming our servers need ever-growing amounts of RAM

13 points by davidklassen


cultpony

Sadly, this webpage considers my normal browser "outdated" (my safari is very up to date thank you), my other browser is vivaldi and also blocked, archive.org is blocked and ghostarchive is blocked and archive.is is also blocked, so the thoughts of the author will forever elude me.

Though presuming from the title, the amount of RAM in a server is IMO still the important metric. Rarely do I run into CPU starvation on my workloads (for about 6TB of traffic a month), but I always have to fight the ever growing need for more RAM in the many many services that need to execute for my stuff (elasticsearch is the worst at it, followed generally by any java based application and then .NET and then the remainder).